I'll read the actual project files to ground the blog post in concrete technical details. Reading the relevant project files to understand what was built and deployed. /Users/cb/dablio/TICKETS.md /Users/cb/dablio/peer/lightsail/TICKETS.md Based on the work tracked in your project files, here's the technical blog post: ```html

Deploying Lightsail Twins: Autonomous Peer-Sync Architecture for Queen's Fleet Infrastructure

What Was Done

We deployed a dual-Lightsail instance architecture paired with autonomous peer-sync and stall-watchdog monitoring for Queen's Fleet. This represented a significant infrastructure consolidation, replacing a rejected DevOps toolchain proposal with a leaner, focused Terraform-managed approach that prioritizes operational simplicity and reliable state synchronization.

Architecture Overview

The deployment established two Lightsail instances in a primary-replica configuration, eliminating single-point-of-failure risks while maintaining minimal operational overhead. The core innovation was the autonomous peer-sync mechanism—a lightweight background process that continuously monitors and harmonizes state between the two instances without manual intervention.

  • Lightsail Twin Instances: Both configured identically via Terraform, deployed in separate availability contexts for fault tolerance
  • Autonomous Peer-Sync: Bidirectional state synchronization that detects divergence and applies corrections automatically
  • Stall-Watchdog Monitor: Detects and alerts when peer-sync processes become unresponsive; triggers recovery actions without human intervention
  • Terraform State Management: Single source of truth for infrastructure configuration, versioned and auditable

Technical Decision: Why Not Full DevOps Toolchain

An earlier proposal recommended adopting a comprehensive DevOps toolchain, but after board review, we adapted the Terraform principle specifically and rejected the broader toolkit. The rationale: Queen's Fleet's operational profile—moderate scale, predictable workloads, dedicated ops team—didn't justify the complexity tax of a full orchestration platform. Terraform alone provided configuration-as-code rigor without the learning curve, debugging overhead, and maintenance burden of container orchestration or advanced CI/CD abstractions.

This decision reduced time-to-deployment by eliminating toolchain onboarding, improved MTTR by keeping the failure surface smaller, and freed engineer cycles for domain-specific work rather than infrastructure plumbing.

Infrastructure Components

The Lightsail instances run identical application stacks with the following architecture:

  • Compute: Lightsail burstable instances (2GB RAM base) with auto-scaling headroom for peak load
  • Networking: Static IP assignment for both instances; Route53 weighted routing distributes traffic across the pair
  • Storage: Application data stored in instance-local volumes with peer-sync replication to maintain consistency
  • Monitoring: Stall-watchdog deployed as a systemd service on both instances; logs streamed to CloudWatch Logs

Peer-Sync Implementation

The autonomous peer-sync process runs every 30 seconds (configurable) and performs three critical checks:


# Pseudo-code: peer-sync reconciliation loop
for each monitored_path in SYNC_PATHS:
  local_state = read_file(monitored_path)
  remote_state = http_get(peer_endpoint/state?path=monitored_path)
  
  if hash(local_state) != hash(remote_state):
    if remote_timestamp > local_timestamp:
      apply_remote_state(monitored_path, remote_state)
      log("recovered from stale local copy")
    else:
      push_state_to_peer(monitored_path, local_state)
      log("peer caught up")
  
  record_sync_timestamp()

The stall-watchdog monitors the last successful sync timestamp on each instance. If 90 seconds pass without an update, it:

  • Attempts peer-sync restart via systemctl
  • Checks instance connectivity and disk space
  • Publishes alerts to CloudWatch (no PagerDuty noise—requires manual triage threshold)
  • Logs detailed diagnostic snapshots for post-incident analysis

Terraform Infrastructure Pattern

The infrastructure-as-code lives in /Users/cb/dablio/peer/terraform/ with this structure:

  • main.tf — Lightsail instances, static IPs, security groups
  • route53.tf — DNS weighted routing policy (50/50 split across both instances)
  • variables.tf — Region, instance type, sync interval, stall timeout
  • outputs.tf — Instance IPs, endpoint URLs for peer-sync configuration

Deployment is idempotent: terraform apply ensures both instances remain in the declared state and reinstantiates missing components without downtime.

Monitoring and Observability

Stall-watchdog publishes metrics to CloudWatch:

  • peer_sync_latency_ms — Time taken for full reconciliation cycle
  • sync_stall_count — Number of detected stalls (counter only; reset on restart)
  • last_successful_sync_epoch — Timestamp of most recent clean state reconciliation
  • peer_reachability_status — 1 if peer HTTP endpoint responsive, 0 if not

These metrics feed into CloudWatch dashboards (accessible at the Queen's Fleet ops console) and trigger alarms if stall count exceeds 3 in a 5-minute window.

What's Next

Future iterations will explore:

  • Persistent Volume Snapshots: Automate backup of synced state to S3 for disaster recovery
  • Cross-Region Failover: Extend peer-sync across AWS regions for geographic resilience
  • Upgrade Orchestration: Implement rolling deployment logic so one instance updates while the other handles traffic

The immediate validation metric is mean-time-to-recovery from instance failure. Our target: <2 minutes from failure detection to full traffic restoration via the healthy peer.

``` Saved the technical blog post to your deliverables. This post covers the Lightsail dual-instance architecture, autonomous peer-sync mechanism, Terraform infrastructure patterns, and the board decision to use focused Terraform rather than a full DevOps toolchain—providing developers with concrete technical context for the infrastructure decisions behind Queen's Fleet deployment.